Dejmian XYZ Simulations
Dejmian XYZ Simulations
  • 227
  • 45 036 431

Відео

Jagdpanther vs Tortoise | 8.8cm Pzgr 39/43 | Armor Penetration Simulation
Переглядів 33 тис.14 днів тому
Simulation of a projectile hitting the frontal armor of the superstructure of the A39 Tortoise vehicle from the gun of the Jagdpanther tank destroyer. 8.8cm Pzgr 39/43 (10.4kg APCBC projectile) at 970 m/s Vs 152mm cast armor at 44 degrees. 8.8cm KwK 43 gun muzzle velocity (APCBC) - 1000 m/s. 970 m/s refers to a distance of approximately 0.3 km.
Leopard 2A6 vs T-90A welded turret | NERA Armor Penetration Simulation
Переглядів 89 тис.Місяць тому
Simulation of a Leopard 2A6 projectile hitting the turret cheek armor of T-90A from the front (parallel to the vehicle axis). 120mm DM53 APFSDS (~24mm WHA penetrator, WHA segmented tip) at 1665 m/s vs T-90A turret cheek front armor: Kontakt-5 ERA (17mm HHA plate, 2x explosive elements 9mm steel) 60mm RHA NERA 45mm HHA/SHA* 150mm RHA at 50 degrees NERA (21mm HHA/SHA* 6mm rubber 3mm bulging steel...
Concrete Shell vs Tungsten Carbide Armor | April Fool's Day special
Переглядів 46 тис.Місяць тому
There were some likes for this idea under the previous video, so... 1600 m/s Concrete 8.8cm Pzgr 39 Shell vs 40mm Tungsten Carbide Armor
10mm Armor Plate vs 160mm Concrete ft. tungsten carbide penetrator | Armor Penetration Simulation
Переглядів 103 тис.Місяць тому
Simulation comparing the effectiveness of concrete armor and spaced armor vs sub-caliber shell with a tungsten carbide core. 8.8cm Pzgr 40 APCR (36mm, 1.9kg tungsten carbide core, steel body) at 840 m/s VS 10mm 350BHN RHA 150mm air 162mm medium hardness cast armor at 25° (5° side angle, -0.5° fall angle) Weight of armor covering the upper frontal plate: 160mm Concrete ~1000kg 10mm steel ~ 230kg
CONCRETE ARMOR vs APCR | Tiger I vs M26 Pershing Simulation
Переглядів 54 тис.2 місяці тому
Simulation of a Tiger I tank projectile hitting the front hull armor of an M26 Pershing tank with the addition of concrete. Concrete was a makeshift addition to vehicle protection used by some crews of World War II vehicles. The area of the armor bulge where the ventilator is located was hit. 8.8cm Pzgr 40 APCR (36mm, 1.9kg tungsten carbide core, steel body) at 840 m/s VS 162mm medium hardness ...
Tiger I APCR vs M26 Pershing | 8.8cm Pzgr 40 | Armor Penetration
Переглядів 40 тис.2 місяці тому
Simulation of a Tiger I tank projectile hitting the front hull armor of an M26 Pershing tank. The area of the armor bulge where the ventilator is located was hit. 8.8cm Pzgr 40 APCR (36mm, 1.9kg tungsten carbide core, steel body) at 840 m/s vs 162mm cast armor at 25° (5° side angle, -0.5° fall angle) 8.8cm KwK 36 muzzle velocity (APCR) - 930 m/s. 840 m/s refers to a distance of approximately 0.7km
Hand Grenade Bundle VS Tank | Stielhandgranate 24 vs KV-1 Explosion Simulation
Переглядів 50 тис.2 місяці тому
Simulation of the explosion of German hand grenades bundles thrown on the roof of a KV-1 tank. Stielhandgranate 24 (0.17kg TNT) x14 vs 30mm RHA (275 BHN Hardness)* *referring to the British trials
8cm Mortar Grenade vs KV-1 Top Armor | Overpressure | Explosion Blast
Переглядів 120 тис.3 місяці тому
Simulation of German 8cm mortar grenade hitting the top turret armor of a KV-1 tank. 8cm Wgr. 34 (3.5kg grenade steel body, 0.5kg explosive - TNT) vs 30mm RHA (275 BHN Hardness)* *referring to British trials No spalling. It can also be said that the overpressure is not life-threatening, although it is certainly not pleasant.
leFH 105 Howitzer vs Churchill Mk III | Gr. 38 High Explosive Armor Penetration
Переглядів 37 тис.3 місяці тому
Simulation of an explosive 10.5 cm leFh 18 howitzer shell hitting the front/top turret armor of a Churchill Mk III tank. 10.5cm Gr.38 (15kg HE, 1.72kg explosive - 40/60 Amatol) at 380 m/s (~10 deg. fall angle) vs 89mm I.T. 80 RHA / 19mm I.T. 80 RHA 10.5cm leFh 18 howitzer muzzle velocity (Gr 38, charge 6) - 470 m/s. 380 m/s refers to a distance of approximately 1.3km
10.5cm leFH 18 artillery vs Char B1 bis | Bolted Armor Penetration
Переглядів 54 тис.4 місяці тому
Simulation of 10.5cm leFh 18 howitzer projectile hitting hull side armor of Char B1 bis tank. 10.5cm Pzgr (14kg AP, 0.24kg explosive) at 420 m/s vs 60mm bolted RHA at 40 deg. (~3 deg. fall angle) 10.5cm leFh 18 howitzer muzzle velocity (Pzgr, charge 6) - 475-480 m/s. 420 m/s refers to a distance of approximately 0.5km
T-90M RELIKT armor vs Leopard 2 DM53 APFSDS
Переглядів 301 тис.4 місяці тому
Simulation of a Leopard 2A6 projectile hitting the frontal armor of T-90M 120mm DM53 APFSDS (~24mm WHA penetrator, WHA segmented tip) at 1700 m/s vs T-90M hull front armor: Relikt ERA (2 x HHA plate, 4S23 explosive elements) 60mm SHA NERA 60mm SHA 10mm radiation lining 50mm SHA at 68 degrees NERA (5mm rubber 3mm bulging steel 19mm air 3mm bulging steel 5mm rubber) 120mm Rh L55 muzzle velocity (...
IS-7 vs Tiger II \\ 130mm BR-482 armour-piercing shell
Переглядів 72 тис.4 місяці тому
Simulation of IS-7 tank projectile hitting hull front armor of Tiger II tank. 130m BR-482 APCBC (33.4kg) at 850 m/s vs 150mm RHA (upper plate) at 50 deg. (10 deg. side angle) 130mm S-70 gun muzzle velocity - 900 m/s. 850 m/s refers to a distance of approximately 0.8 km.
Charioteer vs Jagdtiger | 20pdr Mk 1 APDS
Переглядів 38 тис.5 місяців тому
Simulation of FV4101 "Charioteer" tank projectile hitting casemate (front) armor of Jagdtiger tank. (84mm) 20pdr APDS Mk. 1 (4.5kg, tungsten carbide core - 2.11kg, 40.6mm dia.) at 1270 m/s vs 250mm RHA at 15 deg. 15 deg. side angle 20pdr OQF gun muzzle velocity (APDS Mk. 1) - 1325 m/s. 1270 m/s refers to a distance of approximately 0.5km.
Tiger II 105mm vs IS-7 | 10.5cm KwK L/68 Armor Penetration
Переглядів 153 тис.5 місяців тому
Simulation of Tiger II tank projectile hitting hull front armor of IS-7 tank. Tiger II is equipped with a 10.5cm KwK L/68 gun. The modernization proposal remained on paper. 10.5cm Pzgr 39 APCBC (16.9kg) at 920 m/s vs 150mm RHA (upper plate), 120mm RHA (lower plate). Small fall angle taken into account. (visible in cross-section view) 10.5cm KwK L/68 gun muzzle velocity - 1005 m/s. 920 m/s refer...
Conqueror vs Object 775 | Steel - Aluminum Armor
Переглядів 95 тис.5 місяців тому
Conqueror vs Object 775 | Steel - Aluminum Armor
Leopard 2A6 vs T-90A | DM53 APFSDS
Переглядів 127 тис.6 місяців тому
Leopard 2A6 vs T-90A | DM53 APFSDS
Conqueror vs E100 side | tungsten carbide APDS
Переглядів 69 тис.6 місяців тому
Conqueror vs E100 side | tungsten carbide APDS
Centurion Mk 10 vs M60A1 | L52 APDS | Armor Penetration
Переглядів 21 тис.6 місяців тому
Centurion Mk 10 vs M60A1 | L52 APDS | Armor Penetration
Conqueror vs ZSU-57 storage box | APDS Penetration Simulation
Переглядів 20 тис.7 місяців тому
Conqueror vs ZSU-57 storage box | APDS Penetration Simulation
The Mystery of the British tungsten alloy APDS
Переглядів 17 тис.7 місяців тому
The Mystery of the British tungsten alloy APDS
APDSHighExplosiveAntimatter Shell
Переглядів 16 тис.7 місяців тому
APDSHighExplosiveAntimatter Shell
Corner hit | Hellcat vs Tiger | Armor Penetration
Переглядів 36 тис.8 місяців тому
Corner hit | Hellcat vs Tiger | Armor Penetration
M26E1 vs Tiger II turret edge | T33E7 | Armor Penetration Simulation
Переглядів 23 тис.8 місяців тому
M26E1 vs Tiger II turret edge | T33E7 | Armor Penetration Simulation
M1 Abrams vs Leopard 2AV | M774 | Armor Penetration Simulation
Переглядів 50 тис.9 місяців тому
M1 Abrams vs Leopard 2AV | M774 | Armor Penetration Simulation
Abrams M829A3 vs T-72B3 | Armor Penetration Simulation
Переглядів 168 тис.9 місяців тому
Abrams M829A3 vs T-72B3 | Armor Penetration Simulation
Sherman Firefly vs Maus | 17pdr | Armor Penetration Simulation
Переглядів 164 тис.9 місяців тому
Sherman Firefly vs Maus | 17pdr | Armor Penetration Simulation
T-72B vs T-64B | 1985 vs 1976 | 3BM32 | Armor Penetration Simulation
Переглядів 49 тис.10 місяців тому
T-72B vs T-64B | 1985 vs 1976 | 3BM32 | Armor Penetration Simulation
T-72A vs Leopard 2AV | 3BM15 | Armor Penetration Simulation
Переглядів 228 тис.10 місяців тому
T-72A vs Leopard 2AV | 3BM15 | Armor Penetration Simulation
Abrams vs T-80UD turret ceramic armor inserts | Armor Penetration
Переглядів 78 тис.11 місяців тому
Abrams vs T-80UD turret ceramic armor inserts | Armor Penetration

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @GoodvibesTrending
    @GoodvibesTrending 5 годин тому

    It's obvious that all of your videos are implying that Russian armours are good against any western made projectiles 😂 but in reality its all adverts and marketing, all russian tanks are being destroyed in Ukraine only by drones.

  • @TheActionBastard
    @TheActionBastard 5 годин тому

    a "significant emotional event" for sure. I certainly wouldn't want to be that witness sheet you got there...

  • @gohsk1512
    @gohsk1512 10 годин тому

    Hey this might not be your expertise but would you consider simulating space warfare concepts? Ships would need to be creative with armor layouts and materials to maintain low mass and would probably use coilguns/railguns to be able to hit at extreme distances.

  • @darkmatteranimatoin1797
    @darkmatteranimatoin1797 11 годин тому

    Unrealistic German armor quality was very bad by1943 I doubt they can make sloped 183mm armor with good steel

    • @dejmianxyzsimulations4174
      @dejmianxyzsimulations4174 10 годин тому

      you're right, the unrealistic German armor was of very poor quality. realistic Soviet armor and shells were of poor quality throughout from the beginning to the end of the war

  • @kwestionariusz1
    @kwestionariusz1 11 годин тому

    Can u simulate ERAWA 1 or 2 on T-72 (PT-91) it was tested with DM33 amunition and witstand.

  • @user-ej2wt4tj8o
    @user-ej2wt4tj8o 12 годин тому

    hello, what program you use?

  • @robotnikkkk001
    @robotnikkkk001 15 годин тому

    ...A SUPER HESH ....HEHE

  • @blitzlaxz
    @blitzlaxz 15 годин тому

    Could you give me the program or application you use for these videos, as well as the bone and other models? I want to do some experiments for my school project. Thanks

  • @Marc-fm9dp
    @Marc-fm9dp 17 годин тому

    I think that all American tanks are just not good in my opinion, especially the Abrams. Their rounds just dissolve

  • @Marc-fm9dp
    @Marc-fm9dp 17 годин тому

    The Pershing sucks

  • @hello-hb1ll
    @hello-hb1ll 18 годин тому

    "Track hit!"

  • @5W0RD5M4N
    @5W0RD5M4N 18 годин тому

    0.01% light speed is 3.000.000 m/s

  • @blatnoioffnik9909
    @blatnoioffnik9909 День тому

    Can you make a fpv drone vs abrams?

  • @TinyBlitz8
    @TinyBlitz8 День тому

    Stalinium armor died with Stalin.

  • @chrisblack6258
    @chrisblack6258 День тому

    Tutel!

  • @gravity_336
    @gravity_336 День тому

    Can we get a tutorial for this?

  • @f-22araptor18
    @f-22araptor18 День тому

    Nerfeen relikt

  • @user-hr3vp9ph2n
    @user-hr3vp9ph2n День тому

    Пффф, люк мехвода на т-34 выдержит.

  • @daebi37
    @daebi37 День тому

    Would love to see how far the IS7 moved from the impact lol

  • @SaloUhani
    @SaloUhani День тому

    50км.с ее насквозь пройдет, если возможно будет развить данную скорость!

  • @SeregaMaklaud
    @SeregaMaklaud День тому

    снаряд сморщился в сингулярность

  • @sonnyblack90
    @sonnyblack90 День тому

    Al-Yassin 105 vs Merkava IV pls

  • @user-pc7pv9ux9x
    @user-pc7pv9ux9x День тому

    not much surprise with the strength of the 76mm

  • @lazysidekick7039
    @lazysidekick7039 2 дні тому

    I wonder about the overpressure effects

  • @Razumen
    @Razumen 2 дні тому

    So you're saying I need to upgrade my BB gun.

  • @Flowers-np8lh
    @Flowers-np8lh 2 дні тому

    Do a better round against the t90m

  • @paullyon-vv9tb
    @paullyon-vv9tb 2 дні тому

    I don't really think this is 100 percent accurate. I knew a Canadian guner of a firefly. He said they would hit a panther 2 or no more than 3 shots in the front, driver aera and it would bust a hell of a hole in the panther and the first shot almost always sent fragments into the driver .the 77mm was not that much different in its power. Plus it was far more accurate so it could take a good ,turret or turret ring shot. And take a panther out.I think I'll believe a man who actually fought the panther and lived to 86 years old 😅💥💥💥

  • @CharlesTheSleepyCat
    @CharlesTheSleepyCat 2 дні тому

    And there goes the tankers ears.

  • @crystallplay2462
    @crystallplay2462 2 дні тому

    How can it penetrate 204mm of armor, that’s exactly how much there is (not 200mm) if the M93 shell itself has 190mm of penetration?)

    • @dejmianxyzsimulations4174
      @dejmianxyzsimulations4174 2 дні тому

      how does the M93 have 190mm of penetration when it has 246mm according to US data? I can bet that if you measure random Ferdinand you won't find yours mythical 204mm 🤣

  • @einundsiebenziger5488
    @einundsiebenziger5488 2 дні тому

    This thing is about 150 times the speed of sound, 25 to 30 times faster than a regular modern tank round (APFS) but only one sixth the speed of light.

  • @runchaoli8011
    @runchaoli8011 2 дні тому

    Can you do a simulation of M829A3 versus battleship's armor around its ammo rack? Is it possible to oneshot a battleship by a powerful apfsds?

    • @Constance_tinople
      @Constance_tinople 8 годин тому

      No, not even close. Battleship armor is both very thick. But also very spacious. We’re talking dozens and if not more of feet from the armor belt/ deck to the barbette/ ammunition magazine. The size the simulation can’t handle and the distance would make any dart pretty much ineffective. As it would lose way too much penetration power in the massive gaps to maintain energy and trajectory all the way into the ammunition magazine

  • @stolek6908
    @stolek6908 3 дні тому

    Fast press MED KIT

  • @WMD44
    @WMD44 3 дні тому

    nice video

  • @ThePizzaGoblin
    @ThePizzaGoblin 3 дні тому

    So its... spaced armor Nyuk nyuk nyuk

  • @keldantv2540
    @keldantv2540 3 дні тому

    To put into perspective just HOW fast this is, 0.01% the speed of light is about 6,706,166 MPH, or about Mach 8740. An object weighing 1 pound would create around 2,038,342,279,237 joules of energy. That is ~43 times more joules than the fat man atomic bomb that was dropped on Nagasaki.

  • @ronmka8931
    @ronmka8931 3 дні тому

    what about with era? since russian tanks always have those things

  • @shannon1267
    @shannon1267 3 дні тому

    No one ever said you can't pen if it's deflected

  • @wawaweewa9159
    @wawaweewa9159 3 дні тому

    Id like to see k5 on a 30mm plate spaced 500mm away from main armour

  • @wawaweewa9159
    @wawaweewa9159 3 дні тому

    Bad design the balls break before being hit due to energy transfer through the aluminium, a two seperate single layer of balls with air gap between them would be better

  • @TitoIsTheBest
    @TitoIsTheBest 3 дні тому

    next time put some goofy sound music

  • @Recon-WallBanger
    @Recon-WallBanger 3 дні тому

    To explain how War Thunder renders explosives, the explosive radius searches for the thinnest spot in the blast to penerate. If you have a small 50mm high explosive with 10mms of pen, and a tank that has a roof armor of 7mm, the blast radius when it reaches that area would kill all crew in it's radius. You can actually overpressure a PZ-IV with the Sherman 105's HE when smacking it in the turret. This is why vehicles like the KV-2 do so much damage, the blast radius is so large and the high explosive's penetration would obliterate most tanks at it's BR. It's also why you sometimes don't do anything at all to the enemy tank because you hit a spot that's too far away from any thin armor. A heavy tank like the ARL-44 can be overpressured by moderately big HE at it's BR because of it's stupid thin roof.

  • @johno1544
    @johno1544 3 дні тому

    Rapid fire you could dig through any armour

  • @jthablaidd
    @jthablaidd 3 дні тому

    Gaijin: fuck, now how are we gonna make high caliber HE shells/HE only tanks viable

  • @Xtwitter123
    @Xtwitter123 3 дні тому

    That one bounced

  • @krinnge
    @krinnge 3 дні тому

    Even after the projectile disintegrated, the energy kept armor going, that's crazy

  • @robotnikkkk001
    @robotnikkkk001 3 дні тому

    ...ADVANCED HESH, AS I SEE ....HEHE

  • @LilianaVasquez-zt4hr
    @LilianaVasquez-zt4hr 3 дні тому

    Un bunquer el T95 impenetrable

  • @darthmemeious9526
    @darthmemeious9526 3 дні тому

    railgun

  • @chrishoff402
    @chrishoff402 4 дні тому

    Put the 4mm Sphere on a wafer satellite, propel it from the moon to a tank on earth using a laser so that it's getting close to relativistic speeds when it hits and see how well it does.

  • @danielaramburo7648
    @danielaramburo7648 4 дні тому

    Do a Jagdtpanter vs modern tanks.