- 227
- 45 036 431
Dejmian XYZ Simulations
Приєднався 20 лют 2018
Numerical modeling using the Finite Element Method.
Mostly armor penetration simulations
Mostly armor penetration simulations
Modern US NERA Simulation | M1150, Abrams armor
An attempt to estimate the effectiveness of modern NERA against kinetic penetrators.
Penetrator velocity - 1650 m/s
Penetrator velocity - 1650 m/s
Переглядів: 30 939
Відео
Jagdpanther vs Tortoise | 8.8cm Pzgr 39/43 | Armor Penetration Simulation
Переглядів 33 тис.14 днів тому
Simulation of a projectile hitting the frontal armor of the superstructure of the A39 Tortoise vehicle from the gun of the Jagdpanther tank destroyer. 8.8cm Pzgr 39/43 (10.4kg APCBC projectile) at 970 m/s Vs 152mm cast armor at 44 degrees. 8.8cm KwK 43 gun muzzle velocity (APCBC) - 1000 m/s. 970 m/s refers to a distance of approximately 0.3 km.
Leopard 2A6 vs T-90A welded turret | NERA Armor Penetration Simulation
Переглядів 89 тис.Місяць тому
Simulation of a Leopard 2A6 projectile hitting the turret cheek armor of T-90A from the front (parallel to the vehicle axis). 120mm DM53 APFSDS (~24mm WHA penetrator, WHA segmented tip) at 1665 m/s vs T-90A turret cheek front armor: Kontakt-5 ERA (17mm HHA plate, 2x explosive elements 9mm steel) 60mm RHA NERA 45mm HHA/SHA* 150mm RHA at 50 degrees NERA (21mm HHA/SHA* 6mm rubber 3mm bulging steel...
Concrete Shell vs Tungsten Carbide Armor | April Fool's Day special
Переглядів 46 тис.Місяць тому
There were some likes for this idea under the previous video, so... 1600 m/s Concrete 8.8cm Pzgr 39 Shell vs 40mm Tungsten Carbide Armor
10mm Armor Plate vs 160mm Concrete ft. tungsten carbide penetrator | Armor Penetration Simulation
Переглядів 103 тис.Місяць тому
Simulation comparing the effectiveness of concrete armor and spaced armor vs sub-caliber shell with a tungsten carbide core. 8.8cm Pzgr 40 APCR (36mm, 1.9kg tungsten carbide core, steel body) at 840 m/s VS 10mm 350BHN RHA 150mm air 162mm medium hardness cast armor at 25° (5° side angle, -0.5° fall angle) Weight of armor covering the upper frontal plate: 160mm Concrete ~1000kg 10mm steel ~ 230kg
CONCRETE ARMOR vs APCR | Tiger I vs M26 Pershing Simulation
Переглядів 54 тис.2 місяці тому
Simulation of a Tiger I tank projectile hitting the front hull armor of an M26 Pershing tank with the addition of concrete. Concrete was a makeshift addition to vehicle protection used by some crews of World War II vehicles. The area of the armor bulge where the ventilator is located was hit. 8.8cm Pzgr 40 APCR (36mm, 1.9kg tungsten carbide core, steel body) at 840 m/s VS 162mm medium hardness ...
Tiger I APCR vs M26 Pershing | 8.8cm Pzgr 40 | Armor Penetration
Переглядів 40 тис.2 місяці тому
Simulation of a Tiger I tank projectile hitting the front hull armor of an M26 Pershing tank. The area of the armor bulge where the ventilator is located was hit. 8.8cm Pzgr 40 APCR (36mm, 1.9kg tungsten carbide core, steel body) at 840 m/s vs 162mm cast armor at 25° (5° side angle, -0.5° fall angle) 8.8cm KwK 36 muzzle velocity (APCR) - 930 m/s. 840 m/s refers to a distance of approximately 0.7km
Hand Grenade Bundle VS Tank | Stielhandgranate 24 vs KV-1 Explosion Simulation
Переглядів 50 тис.2 місяці тому
Simulation of the explosion of German hand grenades bundles thrown on the roof of a KV-1 tank. Stielhandgranate 24 (0.17kg TNT) x14 vs 30mm RHA (275 BHN Hardness)* *referring to the British trials
8cm Mortar Grenade vs KV-1 Top Armor | Overpressure | Explosion Blast
Переглядів 120 тис.3 місяці тому
Simulation of German 8cm mortar grenade hitting the top turret armor of a KV-1 tank. 8cm Wgr. 34 (3.5kg grenade steel body, 0.5kg explosive - TNT) vs 30mm RHA (275 BHN Hardness)* *referring to British trials No spalling. It can also be said that the overpressure is not life-threatening, although it is certainly not pleasant.
leFH 105 Howitzer vs Churchill Mk III | Gr. 38 High Explosive Armor Penetration
Переглядів 37 тис.3 місяці тому
Simulation of an explosive 10.5 cm leFh 18 howitzer shell hitting the front/top turret armor of a Churchill Mk III tank. 10.5cm Gr.38 (15kg HE, 1.72kg explosive - 40/60 Amatol) at 380 m/s (~10 deg. fall angle) vs 89mm I.T. 80 RHA / 19mm I.T. 80 RHA 10.5cm leFh 18 howitzer muzzle velocity (Gr 38, charge 6) - 470 m/s. 380 m/s refers to a distance of approximately 1.3km
10.5cm leFH 18 artillery vs Char B1 bis | Bolted Armor Penetration
Переглядів 54 тис.4 місяці тому
Simulation of 10.5cm leFh 18 howitzer projectile hitting hull side armor of Char B1 bis tank. 10.5cm Pzgr (14kg AP, 0.24kg explosive) at 420 m/s vs 60mm bolted RHA at 40 deg. (~3 deg. fall angle) 10.5cm leFh 18 howitzer muzzle velocity (Pzgr, charge 6) - 475-480 m/s. 420 m/s refers to a distance of approximately 0.5km
T-90M RELIKT armor vs Leopard 2 DM53 APFSDS
Переглядів 301 тис.4 місяці тому
Simulation of a Leopard 2A6 projectile hitting the frontal armor of T-90M 120mm DM53 APFSDS (~24mm WHA penetrator, WHA segmented tip) at 1700 m/s vs T-90M hull front armor: Relikt ERA (2 x HHA plate, 4S23 explosive elements) 60mm SHA NERA 60mm SHA 10mm radiation lining 50mm SHA at 68 degrees NERA (5mm rubber 3mm bulging steel 19mm air 3mm bulging steel 5mm rubber) 120mm Rh L55 muzzle velocity (...
IS-7 vs Tiger II \\ 130mm BR-482 armour-piercing shell
Переглядів 72 тис.4 місяці тому
Simulation of IS-7 tank projectile hitting hull front armor of Tiger II tank. 130m BR-482 APCBC (33.4kg) at 850 m/s vs 150mm RHA (upper plate) at 50 deg. (10 deg. side angle) 130mm S-70 gun muzzle velocity - 900 m/s. 850 m/s refers to a distance of approximately 0.8 km.
Charioteer vs Jagdtiger | 20pdr Mk 1 APDS
Переглядів 38 тис.5 місяців тому
Simulation of FV4101 "Charioteer" tank projectile hitting casemate (front) armor of Jagdtiger tank. (84mm) 20pdr APDS Mk. 1 (4.5kg, tungsten carbide core - 2.11kg, 40.6mm dia.) at 1270 m/s vs 250mm RHA at 15 deg. 15 deg. side angle 20pdr OQF gun muzzle velocity (APDS Mk. 1) - 1325 m/s. 1270 m/s refers to a distance of approximately 0.5km.
Tiger II 105mm vs IS-7 | 10.5cm KwK L/68 Armor Penetration
Переглядів 153 тис.5 місяців тому
Simulation of Tiger II tank projectile hitting hull front armor of IS-7 tank. Tiger II is equipped with a 10.5cm KwK L/68 gun. The modernization proposal remained on paper. 10.5cm Pzgr 39 APCBC (16.9kg) at 920 m/s vs 150mm RHA (upper plate), 120mm RHA (lower plate). Small fall angle taken into account. (visible in cross-section view) 10.5cm KwK L/68 gun muzzle velocity - 1005 m/s. 920 m/s refer...
Conqueror vs Object 775 | Steel - Aluminum Armor
Переглядів 95 тис.5 місяців тому
Conqueror vs Object 775 | Steel - Aluminum Armor
Leopard 2A6 vs T-90A | DM53 APFSDS
Переглядів 127 тис.6 місяців тому
Leopard 2A6 vs T-90A | DM53 APFSDS
Conqueror vs E100 side | tungsten carbide APDS
Переглядів 69 тис.6 місяців тому
Conqueror vs E100 side | tungsten carbide APDS
Centurion Mk 10 vs M60A1 | L52 APDS | Armor Penetration
Переглядів 21 тис.6 місяців тому
Centurion Mk 10 vs M60A1 | L52 APDS | Armor Penetration
Conqueror vs ZSU-57 storage box | APDS Penetration Simulation
Переглядів 20 тис.7 місяців тому
Conqueror vs ZSU-57 storage box | APDS Penetration Simulation
The Mystery of the British tungsten alloy APDS
Переглядів 17 тис.7 місяців тому
The Mystery of the British tungsten alloy APDS
Corner hit | Hellcat vs Tiger | Armor Penetration
Переглядів 36 тис.8 місяців тому
Corner hit | Hellcat vs Tiger | Armor Penetration
M26E1 vs Tiger II turret edge | T33E7 | Armor Penetration Simulation
Переглядів 23 тис.8 місяців тому
M26E1 vs Tiger II turret edge | T33E7 | Armor Penetration Simulation
M1 Abrams vs Leopard 2AV | M774 | Armor Penetration Simulation
Переглядів 50 тис.9 місяців тому
M1 Abrams vs Leopard 2AV | M774 | Armor Penetration Simulation
Abrams M829A3 vs T-72B3 | Armor Penetration Simulation
Переглядів 168 тис.9 місяців тому
Abrams M829A3 vs T-72B3 | Armor Penetration Simulation
Sherman Firefly vs Maus | 17pdr | Armor Penetration Simulation
Переглядів 164 тис.9 місяців тому
Sherman Firefly vs Maus | 17pdr | Armor Penetration Simulation
T-72B vs T-64B | 1985 vs 1976 | 3BM32 | Armor Penetration Simulation
Переглядів 49 тис.10 місяців тому
T-72B vs T-64B | 1985 vs 1976 | 3BM32 | Armor Penetration Simulation
T-72A vs Leopard 2AV | 3BM15 | Armor Penetration Simulation
Переглядів 228 тис.10 місяців тому
T-72A vs Leopard 2AV | 3BM15 | Armor Penetration Simulation
Abrams vs T-80UD turret ceramic armor inserts | Armor Penetration
Переглядів 78 тис.11 місяців тому
Abrams vs T-80UD turret ceramic armor inserts | Armor Penetration
It's obvious that all of your videos are implying that Russian armours are good against any western made projectiles 😂 but in reality its all adverts and marketing, all russian tanks are being destroyed in Ukraine only by drones.
a "significant emotional event" for sure. I certainly wouldn't want to be that witness sheet you got there...
Hey this might not be your expertise but would you consider simulating space warfare concepts? Ships would need to be creative with armor layouts and materials to maintain low mass and would probably use coilguns/railguns to be able to hit at extreme distances.
Unrealistic German armor quality was very bad by1943 I doubt they can make sloped 183mm armor with good steel
you're right, the unrealistic German armor was of very poor quality. realistic Soviet armor and shells were of poor quality throughout from the beginning to the end of the war
Can u simulate ERAWA 1 or 2 on T-72 (PT-91) it was tested with DM33 amunition and witstand.
hello, what program you use?
Ansys
...A SUPER HESH ....HEHE
Could you give me the program or application you use for these videos, as well as the bone and other models? I want to do some experiments for my school project. Thanks
I think that all American tanks are just not good in my opinion, especially the Abrams. Their rounds just dissolve
The Pershing sucks
"Track hit!"
0.01% light speed is 3.000.000 m/s
Can you make a fpv drone vs abrams?
Stalinium armor died with Stalin.
Tutel!
Can we get a tutorial for this?
Nerfeen relikt
Пффф, люк мехвода на т-34 выдержит.
Would love to see how far the IS7 moved from the impact lol
50км.с ее насквозь пройдет, если возможно будет развить данную скорость!
снаряд сморщился в сингулярность
Al-Yassin 105 vs Merkava IV pls
not much surprise with the strength of the 76mm
I wonder about the overpressure effects
So you're saying I need to upgrade my BB gun.
Do a better round against the t90m
I would do best one, but there are no leaks
@@dejmianxyzsimulations4174 okay
@@dejmianxyzsimulations4174what about m829a3
I don't really think this is 100 percent accurate. I knew a Canadian guner of a firefly. He said they would hit a panther 2 or no more than 3 shots in the front, driver aera and it would bust a hell of a hole in the panther and the first shot almost always sent fragments into the driver .the 77mm was not that much different in its power. Plus it was far more accurate so it could take a good ,turret or turret ring shot. And take a panther out.I think I'll believe a man who actually fought the panther and lived to 86 years old 😅💥💥💥
And there goes the tankers ears.
How can it penetrate 204mm of armor, that’s exactly how much there is (not 200mm) if the M93 shell itself has 190mm of penetration?)
how does the M93 have 190mm of penetration when it has 246mm according to US data? I can bet that if you measure random Ferdinand you won't find yours mythical 204mm 🤣
This thing is about 150 times the speed of sound, 25 to 30 times faster than a regular modern tank round (APFS) but only one sixth the speed of light.
Can you do a simulation of M829A3 versus battleship's armor around its ammo rack? Is it possible to oneshot a battleship by a powerful apfsds?
No, not even close. Battleship armor is both very thick. But also very spacious. We’re talking dozens and if not more of feet from the armor belt/ deck to the barbette/ ammunition magazine. The size the simulation can’t handle and the distance would make any dart pretty much ineffective. As it would lose way too much penetration power in the massive gaps to maintain energy and trajectory all the way into the ammunition magazine
Fast press MED KIT
nice video
So its... spaced armor Nyuk nyuk nyuk
To put into perspective just HOW fast this is, 0.01% the speed of light is about 6,706,166 MPH, or about Mach 8740. An object weighing 1 pound would create around 2,038,342,279,237 joules of energy. That is ~43 times more joules than the fat man atomic bomb that was dropped on Nagasaki.
what about with era? since russian tanks always have those things
No one ever said you can't pen if it's deflected
Id like to see k5 on a 30mm plate spaced 500mm away from main armour
Bad design the balls break before being hit due to energy transfer through the aluminium, a two seperate single layer of balls with air gap between them would be better
next time put some goofy sound music
To explain how War Thunder renders explosives, the explosive radius searches for the thinnest spot in the blast to penerate. If you have a small 50mm high explosive with 10mms of pen, and a tank that has a roof armor of 7mm, the blast radius when it reaches that area would kill all crew in it's radius. You can actually overpressure a PZ-IV with the Sherman 105's HE when smacking it in the turret. This is why vehicles like the KV-2 do so much damage, the blast radius is so large and the high explosive's penetration would obliterate most tanks at it's BR. It's also why you sometimes don't do anything at all to the enemy tank because you hit a spot that's too far away from any thin armor. A heavy tank like the ARL-44 can be overpressured by moderately big HE at it's BR because of it's stupid thin roof.
Rapid fire you could dig through any armour
Gaijin: fuck, now how are we gonna make high caliber HE shells/HE only tanks viable
That one bounced
Even after the projectile disintegrated, the energy kept armor going, that's crazy
...ADVANCED HESH, AS I SEE ....HEHE
Un bunquer el T95 impenetrable
railgun
Put the 4mm Sphere on a wafer satellite, propel it from the moon to a tank on earth using a laser so that it's getting close to relativistic speeds when it hits and see how well it does.
Do a Jagdtpanter vs modern tanks.